Now you have macro variables that has had the new varying labels and changeable names

Now you have macro variables that has had the new varying labels and changeable names

investigation category; identity identity = 'Name Label' gender = 'Sex Label' years = 'Age Label' top = 'Height Label' pounds = 'Weight Label'; set sashelp.class; run;
proc declaration study=class; column ('Name Label' title) ('Sex Label' sex) ('Age Label' age) ('Height Label' height) ('Weight Label' weight); attrib _all_ label=" "; run;

Wiser maybe – but initially much more really works: you can read new adjustable names and you will names from possibly PROC Content material efficiency otherwise from the dictionary dining tables, following do a beneficial macro one essentially produces the Name statement which you have.

proc sql noprint; see label, coalesce(name,name) towards the :labels separated because of the ' ',:brands e='SASHELP' and you can memname='GAS' purchase because of the varnum; quit; %set &=names; %place &=labels;

Re: Demonstrating one another adjustable label and you will variable title in the dining table header Released 08-11-2022 Was (772 feedback) | Inside respond to xxformat_com

investigation category; set sashelp.class; name name = 'Name Label (NAME)' gender = 'Sex Term (SEX)' decades = 'Age Term (AGE)' top = 'Height Title (HEIGHT)' lbs = 'Weight Term (WEIGHT)' ; run;
proc statement analysis=class; run;
study category; put sashelp.class; identity term = 'Name Label' intercourse = 'Sex Label' many years = 'Age Label' level = 'Height Label' pounds = 'Weight Label' ; run; proc transpose data=class(obs=0) out=names; var _all_; run; filename password temp; studies labels; duration varnum 8 _name_ $32 _label_ $256 ; set labels ; varnum+1; file code ; _label_=coalescec(_label_,_name_); _label_=catx(' lien hypertexte significatif ',_label_,cats('(',upcase(_name_),')')); lay 'label ' _name_ '=' _label_ :$quotation. ';'; run; 

Now often work on the fresh new made Label statements into the a document action otherwise PROC DATASETS action to evolve brand new connected brands.

1206 proc declaration studies=classification ; 1207 %become code / source2; NOTE: %Are (height step 1) document Code was document . \#LN00063. 1208 +identity Title ="Identity Term (NAME)" ; 1209 +name Sex ="Gender Name (SEX)" ; 1210 +label Many years ="Many years Term (AGE)" ; 1211 +name Height ="Top Title (HEIGHT)" ; 1212 +label Pounds ="Pounds Label (WEIGHT)" ; NOTE: %Are (peak step one) stop. 1213 focus on;

Re: Displaying each other adjustable identity and varying label regarding table header Released 08-11-2022 Are (761 viewpoints) | During the react to xxformat_com

study class; lay sashelp.class; term label = 'Name Label' sex = 'Sex Label' ages = 'Age Label' level = 'Height Label' weight = 'Weight Label'; run; proc sql noprint; discover catx(' ','("',identity,'"',identity,')') into the :header age='WORK' and you will memname='CLASS'; quit; proc declaration research=group nowd; line &heading ; attrib _all_ label=" "; run; 

If you need the fresh label showing title upcoming include the name from the identity and simply make use of the Identity because the new header

Re: Displaying each other variable label and you will changeable identity in the dining table header Published 08-11-2022 Was (753 viewpoints) | In the respond to xxformat_com

Discovering one other reactions, We today question when your real question is: how exactly to accomplish that and so the variable name’s constantly followed by the phrase Term; or if you wanted some thing far more standard where you can find real labels that are different than new changeable label.

Re: Exhibiting each other changeable term and you can changeable name throughout the dining table heading Released 08-11-2022 PM (704 viewpoints) | Into the answer PaigeMiller

You’re right. My brand spanking new concern wasn’t from the incorporating new variable title within the supports adopting the variable. But it is other fascinating approach for getting one another adjustable name and you may name, I hadn’t regarded as. I take it given that a good suggestion because helps to make the code white.

My real concern was to get one row into the changeable title and another you to definitely into varying term without the need to automate (i.e. instead research _null_ otherwise as opposed to macro language).

If you like brand new label to display the name up coming is the name on the label and only utilize the Label given that the newest heading

Re: Exhibiting one another changeable term and varying identity regarding table header Posted 08-11-2022 PM (701 views) | For the react to xxformat_com

wrote:You happen to be proper. My brand-new concern wasn’t on the adding the brand new varying term during the mounts following the varying. But it’s several other fascinating approach for getting both changeable term and you can term, I hadn’t thought about. I bring it as a good suggestion because makes the password light.

My actual question would be to have one line with the variable term and another one to the adjustable term without the need to automate (i.elizabeth. rather than investigation _null_ or in the place of macro language).

Re: Demonstrating each other changeable name and variable title regarding dining table header Printed 08-11-2022 Have always been (792 opinions) | In the answer xxformat_com blogged:

I want to point out that your don’t address my personal matter. And thus little could have been cleared up. Your own brand-new password took new changeable name and you can appended the phrase “Label” referring to now this new name we should play with. Would be the fact anything you is actually inquiring to complete, append the term “Label” pursuing the varying name, otherwise would you like to use the actual changeable names? Such as, inside the SASHELP.Energy in which around three of one’s details about data put has a label connected with they, the fresh new adjustable CPRATIO has actually label “Compression Proportion”, and thus how would you like “Compressing Ratio” to appear in the PROC Declaration returns otherwise do you need “CPRATIO Term” to surface in their PROC Declaration yields? Delight get this clear.

Need a reply without macros and instead Study _NULL_ – as to why? As to why beat appropriate gadgets to get the work complete?

Deja un comentario

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *

Scroll al inicio